Erring Together: Renaissance Humanists in Certainty’s Shadow*
نویسندگان
چکیده
Everyone makes mistakes. Still, getting things wrong can be a lonely experience. In religious thought as in philosophy or cognitive science, error is equated with imperfection: anyone who wants to be right needs to correct or supersede mistakes. Indeed, certainty—the need to be sure one is right—has been identified as the obsession that defined the age in Susan Schreiner’s powerful recent study of early modern Christianity. In what follows, I suggest first that this argument about the centrality of certainty obscures the importance of making mistakes—of errancy—to religious movements of the sixteenth century. The Reformation era was, as Schreiner maintains, defined by the fear of deception and the need to be sure—of God, of salvation, of scriptural interpretation. However, error can also facilitate camaraderie. This was the counterintuitive conviction voiced by Desiderius Erasmus and Thomas More, humanists writing during the time Schreiner surveys, when error was a threat not only to a scholar’s status but to life itself—both temporal and eternal. What is remarkable about these two Reformation-era intellectuals is that despitemanifest differences in their ecclesiology, both understood error as a source of fragile solidarity, even a sacred bond of charity. In dedicatory letters, devotional treatises, and ironic writings, Erasmus andMore portrayed making and correcting mistakes as a communal process that enabled friendship and right religion by disabling pedantic certainty. This has implications for the study of religion because of the widespread assumption ðarguably influenced by the Reformation attitudes Schreiner
منابع مشابه
In the shadow of the Enlightenment. Occultism and Renaissance science in eighteenth-century America
متن کامل
The influence of the final cause doctrine on anatomists of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries concerning selected anatomical structures of the head and neck.
The Doctrine of Final Cause, taken from Aristotle's "causes" and modified by Claudius (Aelius) Galen (of Pergamon) stated that for an anatomical part to exist it must have a "cause," not an end point, but a purpose or goal, natural or divine. This affected the renaissance anatomist's thinking. We explore this doctrine's relationship with human head and neck anatomy from antiquity's Aristotle an...
متن کاملThe rage of party: a glorious revolution in English psychiatry?
THE creed of science as value-neutral, and our experience of medicine's capacity to be perverted into a demoralizing "discourse of power", together strengthen our wish that psychiatry should be free of politics, as from Szasz to Solzhenitsyn, we confront the evils of conditioning and the disabling of dissidents as disturbed and insane.' But four hundred years ago, official dogma, the Elizabetha...
متن کاملMaps as Educational Tools in the Renaissance
Maps were part of both formal and informal education in early modern Europe, although they performed different functions and had a different status in each setting. While the more institutional curricula of grammar schools and universities treated geography as more important, with maps seen as useful only for their illustrative properties, informal market-driven and patronage-supported educatio...
متن کاملIntegrating Science and the Humanities: Toward a Second Wave
The relationship between the sciences and the humanities has long been a fraught one—a tension famously captured by C.P. Snow in the phrase “The Two Cultures” (Snow 1959/1993). The belief that humanists study “texts”—in the broad sense that this term has acquired in recent decades—while scientists study “things” is still commonplace in modern universities. The two groups typically perform their...
متن کامل